The impact sound had on the early cinema

-
The impact sound had on the early cinema was big because most of the films made in the 1920's were silent so to have sound was a massive new element to shape the tone of the film. This made room for music and all sorts of different sound like Foley, diegetic and non-diegetic sound.

Diegetic sound is, for example, characters voices, the sound made by objects in the story (Foley) and even music from instruments in the story space (source sound). This means that diegetic sound can either be from on or off the screen depending on where the music is being played from.

Non-diegetic sound is from a narrator's commentary like in documentaries, sound effects for dramatic effect and mood music. So mood music is also background music in most scenes since it isn't the main feature but if you use it as the only piece of sound if nothing is happening within the shot then you can use it as the main sound feature but not when other characters are talking.

The difference between diegetic and non-diegetic depends on where the sound is coming from. So this means that if the sound is represented as coming from on camera which is playing right there when you film, you can say this is diegetic. If the sound is coming from off camera and was added in during editing this is non-diegetic. To help you remember this you can remember non-diegetic as commentary sound and diegetic to be actual sound.

This definitely had a huge impact on the early cinema because it was about so much more than just a characters movement like in Charlie Chaplin's films. This required a lot of skill to be able to say the words correctly in a script so this opened up more acting jobs which is how Hollywood blew up into the phenomenon it is now. More and more people went to the cinema because of this now which meant that the money would have gotten much, much bigger. The more people went the more technology got involved with better picture and sound which is still happening today.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PITCH FEEDBACK

-
Opinion from pitch My pitch was great! I know that I must be more vigilant and thoroughly plan my project out, and I will up my game to aim for the Distinction grade. I know it went well because I knew my point was getting across. The point of this film is the fact that the 'Caterham' is an under-rated underdog supercar that people have overlooked. Or just simply that people don't know about it. So I will teach them not just about the car but the community and the whole prospectus. I knew this was getting across since my presentation was explaining it. Ed told me that my presentation was good so I could tell he knew what I wanted to do. I told him about the community and it says in my presentation that it exists. I hadn't told him statistics yet since I am saving that for my film. I wish that I could have done a whole presentation with a projector and standing up I feel that it would have run smoother instead of me sitting down and talking about it. If I am ever to
Read more

60 Seconds

-
Image
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKNi9IYfMTc In my 60 second video, I chose to go with tension as my genre. I haven't tried tension and it was something I wanted to do. I liked making this film but at the start, I was aiming for a comedy and I guess it is a bit of both.  From target 3.1 I learned new and interesting shot types such as, a low angle looking up and the high angle looking down which are great to use because they show how a character is feeling. For example, the low angle looking up can show that a character is feeling intimidated and a high angle looking down is the person providing the argument. I learned this through watching 'A few good men" in the "You can't handle the truth" scene.  In my film, I use the low angle facing up to the girl so the guy in the chair was feeling intimidated. This gives my film a twist because you don't expect the guy in the chair to be intimidated since he is giving the girl orders. I tried to crea
Read more

Feedback

-
For the product assessment, I have asked 4 people to write a short paragraph stating what was good and bad about my film and what I could change. I did this not only because the brief requires it but out of personal interest to see what people made of my film. I was very intrigued by what they thought of it and not for them to just say 'good' but go into detail and perhaps pick my film apart. This method has definitely proven worthy in the past as I have had much feedback on previous short films explaining not only what was wrong but why it was wrong which helped me learn a great deal about me as a director and learn a lot more about my film. I have learned many valuable lessons such as; 'Always keep your target audience in mind' and 'keep the camera work as smooth as possible if it's a crucial scene.' It is things like this that teach me and allow me to be a better director in the future. I definitely did keep my target audience in mind while making th
Read more